Loveless Mfg. Co. v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
This is an action for damages arising out of a contract of carriage. Jurisdiction of the court is based on diversity of citizenship and the required jurisdictional amount. Third parties were brought in under the Third Party Practice, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 14(a), 28 U.S.C.A.
Sometime prior to the contract of carriage here involved, a representative of the defendant Roadway Express, Inc., 1 an Ohio corporation, contacted the plaintiff, Loveless Manufacturing Company, 2 an Oklahoma concern, to solicit the business of transporting a large shearing machine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc. v. VolentineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Mushroom Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Columbus & G. Ry. Co. v. OwensMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Textron, Inc. v. Lowell Trucking Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by12 opinions
- General Electric Company, and Third-Party v. Kelly C. Moretz, and Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Sydnor & Hundley, Inc. v. Wilson Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Teleco, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.