The People v. Karl Chu-Joi
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant Chu-Joi * appeals from an order of the Appellate Division, Second Department, which affirmed Supreme Court’s denial, without a hearing, of defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside his sentence. Defendant contends that his allegations and supporting documents establish he was 15 years old at the time of the offense and therefore should have been sentenced as a juvenile offender not as an adult. In support of his motion, defendant, who was born in Peru, attached a copy of his baptismal and birth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. FriedgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mahoney v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. KabiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. Abdul-JaleelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.