Zorola v. Bishop & Son
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CADENA, Justice.
Appellant, John R. Zorola, sued appellee, Bishop & Son, contractor, for cancellation of a note and a mechanic’s lien contract executed by appellant in favor of appellee, or, in the alternative, for damages for breach of contract. Appellee filed a cross-action seeking full recovery on the note in the sum of $3,350.00, with foreclosure of the mechanic’s lien, or, in the alternative, for recovery on the basis of quantum me-ruit, alleging the reasonable value of the work performed by it to be $3,350.00.
The mechanic’s lien contract provided that in the event of non-completion of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Murphy v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Mathes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Taylor v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bugh v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. Howard Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Davidson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Process Operators, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Wood v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.