Legal Opinion

Zorola v. Bishop & Son

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1966No. 14476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Appellant, John R. Zorola, sued appellee, Bishop & Son, contractor, for cancellation of a note and a mechanic’s lien contract executed by appellant in favor of appellee, or, in the alternative, for damages for breach of contract. Appellee filed a cross-action seeking full recovery on the note in the sum of $3,350.00, with foreclosure of the mechanic’s lien, or, in the alternative, for recovery on the basis of quantum me-ruit, alleging the reasonable value of the work performed by it to be $3,350.00.

The mechanic’s lien contract provided that in the event of non-completion of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Murphy v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Mathes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Taylor v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bugh v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. Howard Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Davidson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Process Operators, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Wood v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API