Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. Yocom

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1929No. 713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Section 5838 GC, is in these words:

“When a Dog May Be Killed; Owner Liable for Damages. — A dog that chases, worries, injures or kills a sheep, lamb, goat, kid, domestic fowl, domestic animal or person, can be killed at any time or place; and, if in attempting to kill such dog running at large a person wounds it, he shah not be liable to prosecution under the penal laws which punish cruelty to animals. The owner or harborer of such dog shall be liable to a person damaged for the injury done.”

That statute was construed by the Supreme Court of our state in the case of Kleybolte v. Buffon, 89…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Job v. HarlanOhio Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Lisk v. HoraOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siegfried v. EverhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Pulley v. MalekOhio Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API