Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. Yocom
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1929No. 713PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Section 5838 GC, is in these words:
“When a Dog May Be Killed; Owner Liable for Damages. — A dog that chases, worries, injures or kills a sheep, lamb, goat, kid, domestic fowl, domestic animal or person, can be killed at any time or place; and, if in attempting to kill such dog running at large a person wounds it, he shah not be liable to prosecution under the penal laws which punish cruelty to animals. The owner or harborer of such dog shall be liable to a person damaged for the injury done.”
That statute was construed by the Supreme Court of our state in the case of Kleybolte v. Buffon, 89…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Job v. HarlanOhio Supreme Court · 1862
- Lisk v. HoraOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Siegfried v. EverhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Pulley v. MalekOhio Supreme Court · 1986