State v. Sprague
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Judge :
The defendant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquors from one point to another within the state, and a fine was imposed upon him. Upon this writ of error primary con-, sideration must be given to the defendant’s challenge of the sufficiency of the indictment, he having properly made his objections thereto in the trial court.
The indictment was returned in October, 1930, and alleged that the offense had been committeed in June of that year. The indictment is framed as though predicated on section 31a, chapter 32-A, Code 1923. It negatives in detail the exceptions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Galeo v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
- State v. WelchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bailey v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HannaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ParksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- State of West Virginia v. Timothy MaichleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2023