Legal Opinion

Rush v. City of Maple Heights

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1958No. 35170Published

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The eighth error assigned by the defendant is that “the trial and appellate courts committed error in permitting plaintiff to split her cause of action and to file a separate action in the Cleveland Municipal Court for her property damage and reduce same to judgment, and, thereafter, to proceed, in the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, with a separate action for personal injuries, both claims arising out of a single accident.”

Other facets of this question have been before the court before.

In the case of Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc., 145 Ohio St., 321, 61 *225N. E. (2d), 707, 166 A. L. R., 855,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Doran v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API