Geordano v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Louisiana
ATl’EAL PROM THE COURT OP THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, JUDGE WATTS PRESIDING. This is an action against the endorsers of a promissory note. The petition alleges that the note was protested at maturity, for non-payment, and due notice thereof given to the endorsers. ^ The defendant, Thomas, excepted to being sued separately from the drawer, as a hardship, and prayed to be'dismissed.
Read the full summary
ATl’EAL PROM THE COURT OP THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, JUDGE WATTS PRESIDING. This is an action against the endorsers of a promissory note. The petition alleges that the note was protested at maturity, for non-payment, and due notice thereof given to the endorsers. ^ The defendant, Thomas, excepted to being sued separately from the drawer, as a hardship, and prayed to be'dismissed. He answered and averred, that the note sued on was given for part of the price of a lot of ground, and that he endorsed it as surety, and is entitled to the benefit of discussion, etc. The plaintiff discontinued as…
1Opinion of the CourtEustis, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the court below, dismissing a supplemental petition filed by the plaintiff. We are of opinion that no appeal lies from a decree of this description.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costs.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mercadel v. MercadelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Maisonneuve v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Barrow v. Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
- Mechanics & Traders' Insurance v. GersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
- Southern Pacific Co. v. MecheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970