Legal Opinion

Dunklin v. Hanna

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1934No. 2 Div. 39PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action on the ease by the appellant against the appellee for damages for personal injuries which plaintiff alleges he received in consequence of the negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile in which both of the parties were traveling from Selma to Marion, Ala. The complaint consists of two counts, in substance and -legal effect the same, alleging that plaintiff was a passenger of the defendant who owned and operated the automobile. The defendant pleaded, in short by consent, the general issue and contributory negligence.

Under the .evidence, both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGeever v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. FlippoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Melton v. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Bierley v. Shelby Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Sacred Heart Church Building Committee v. MansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kemp v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Edwards v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Ex Parte BarranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. City of Montgomery v. BennettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Robin Darnell, United States of America v. Nance's Creek Farms, Etc., Richard Garza and Gerald WillisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API