Legal Opinion

Bradley v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 17, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00643Unknown

1Opinion

NASHVILLE DIVISION BENJAMIN EDWARD-HENRY ) BRADLEY, ) ) Movant, ) No. 3:19-cv-00643 ) Judge Trauger v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is pro se movant Benjamin Edward-Henry Bradley’s motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence previously imposed by this court. (Doc. No. 1). See United States v. Bradley, No. 3:15-cr-00037-2 (M.D. Tenn.) [hereinafter cited as “Crim. Doc. No. ___”]. The government filed a response to the motion, urging that none of Bradley’s claims present a valid basis for post-conviction relief.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API