Legal Opinion

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lindsay

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1993No. C1-92-2295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellants Craig Lindsay and Edward Melzark, former agents of respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company, challenged the denial of relief under Minn.Stat. § 60A.177 (1990) for termination of their agency contracts with American Family. We affirm as to Lindsay and reverse and remand as to Melzark.

FACTS

Appellants Craig Lindsay and Edward Melzark each entered into an agency agreement with American Family. Each agency agreement contained the following termination provision:

This agreement may be terminated by either party with or without cause by giving written notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. County of St. Louis v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Farmers Union Agency, Inc. v. ButenhoffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API