American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lindsay
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellants Craig Lindsay and Edward Melzark, former agents of respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company, challenged the denial of relief under Minn.Stat. § 60A.177 (1990) for termination of their agency contracts with American Family. We affirm as to Lindsay and reverse and remand as to Melzark.
FACTS
Appellants Craig Lindsay and Edward Melzark each entered into an agency agreement with American Family. Each agency agreement contained the following termination provision:
This agreement may be terminated by either party with or without cause by giving written notice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- County of St. Louis v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Farmers Union Agency, Inc. v. ButenhoffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007