Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. City of Shreveport

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 2014No. Nos. 48,608-CA, 48,609-CA, 48,610-CA, 48,611-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

hThe res nova issue presented in this appeal concerns whether annexation by the City of Shreveport (“the city”) of Cad-do Parish territory, which included dedicated public roads, transferred ownership of the public roads and underlying acreage to the city so that the city, rather than Caddo Parish, is entitled to the proceeds of mineral production attributable to that acreage. On competing summary judgment motions, the trial court concluded that the city did not acquire ownership of the dedicated public roads upon annexation. For reasons explained in this opinion, our de novo review leads…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Garrett v. Pioneer Production Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. P & L INVESTMENT CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Pociask v. MoseleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stonecipher v. Caddo ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API