Legal Opinion
In re Crusader Oil Refining Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 9, 1942No. 9407/127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This court is requested to review an order of a Referee in Bankruptcy dismissing the petition and vacating an order to show cause in the matter of Crusader Oil Refining Corporation, Debtor.
The Referee dismissed the petition on the grounds (1) that the petitioner was not a party in interest in the sense in which that term is used in Section 386 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 786, which permits a party in interest to make application to set aside an arrangement after confirmation; (2) that the petition was not filed within the six months’ period required by Section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Ebeling v. BobengCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- In re ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Matter of NEWPORT HARBOR ASSOCIATES, D/B/A Newport Harbor Treadway, Inc., Etc. and James W. Kirby, Etc., Debtors, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Berg v. TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd. (In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re GrossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1990
- J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Matter of 20546 Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976