Legal Opinion

State v. Kelley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. CF 92-0008; CA A75523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). Before trial, the court dismissed the charge on the ground that the state is collaterally estopped from prosecuting defendant for the charged conduct, because the same conduct had previously formed the basis for a revocation of probation on an earlier conviction. Defendant concedes that collateral estoppel does not prevent the state from prosecuting him for possession of a controlled substance. He contends, however, that prosecution is barred for reasons of former jeopardy.

In State v. Maricich, 101 Or App 212,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MaricichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Matter of Lucio FTNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API