Legal Opinion
Tetra Tech Amt v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 11, 2016No. 16-632CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Post-Award Bid Protest; Interpretation of Solicitation; Ambiguity; Argument Raised in Reply Brief; Technical Evaluation.
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge
This post-award bid protest arose out of a solicitation issued by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to obtain comprehensive Information Technology Customer Support (ITCS) services. Plaintiff Tetra Tech AMT (Tetra Tech), the incumbent contractor, protests the award of the contract to Intervenor Dell Services Federal Government, Inc. (Dell).
Presently before the'Court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Homeland Security Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Quanterion Solutions, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Sirius Federal, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021