Dean v. State Road Department
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
The defendants in an eminent domain proceeding,1 appeal a supplemental judgment for interest and attorneys’ fees. The first point urges that the trial judge was without authority to enter the judgment because he was a judge assigned from another circuit, and that the period of the assignment had expired. An examination of the order assigning the judge pursuant to Rule 2.1, subd. a(4) (c), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., reveals that this point is without merit.
Appellants’ second point urges that the fee allowed their attorney is inadequate. Evidence was taken before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Road Dept. v. ForehandSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Peeler v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Dean v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Hillsborough County v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Dean v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dade County v. Oolite Rock CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- City of Miami v. CulbertsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973