Vaughn v. Ferris
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to the Common Pleas of Luzerne county. John Yaughn, Jr., against Isaac Ferris and Samuel Ferris. This was a scire facias upon a judgment entered upon the following agreement and bond: Be it remembered that on the 21st day of November one thousand eight hundred and thirty-two, it is agreed between ' Samuel Ferris, of the township of Blakely, county of Luzerne, and state of Pennsylvania, and John Vaughn, Jr., of the township of Providence, in the county and state…
Read the full summary
ERROR to the Common Pleas of Luzerne county. John Yaughn, Jr., against Isaac Ferris and Samuel Ferris. This was a scire facias upon a judgment entered upon the following agreement and bond: Be it remembered that on the 21st day of November one thousand eight hundred and thirty-two, it is agreed between ' Samuel Ferris, of the township of Blakely, county of Luzerne, and state of Pennsylvania, and John Vaughn, Jr., of the township of Providence, in the county and state aforesaid, in manner and form following, to wit: The said Samuel Ferris for the consideration hereinafter mentioned, doth for…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Kennedy, J.
The several errors assigned in this court, founded on the exceptions taken to the opinion of the court below, may all be disposed of by deciding the question whether the parol agreement alleged by the plaintiff below to have been made subsequently to the execution of the bond, can be considered as being incorporated into and forming a part of the condition thereunder written. For if it cannot, then the evidence mentioned in the first bill of exception offered by the counsel of the plaintiff, and admitted by the court, for the purpose of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vicary v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carrier & Baum v. DilworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- McManus v. CassidySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870