Legal Opinion

Hrusko v. Public Service Coordinated Transport Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Hew York County, entered on February 16, 1972, granting plaintiff’s application to serve an amended bill of particulars and to amend the ad damnum, clause of the complaint, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements; leave is also given to defendant to conduct a further physical examination of plaintiff, if so advised. The granting of a motion of this character is ordinarily within the sound discretion of the court (Soulier v. Harrison, 21 A D 2d 725 ; 6 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 34:16), and the motion herein was made not on the eve of trial, but at a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Miranda v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Best v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Cossart v. PredenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Wardlaw v. Ford Marketing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API