Sheldon Barr v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Sheldon Barr appeals from a jury verdict before Judge Trager holding him liable for tax penalties under I.R.C. §§ 6700, 6701. In this published opinion we address appellant’s claim that the district court erroneously charged the jury that the government need prove such liability only by a preponderance of the evidence. Appellant argues that the clear and convincing evidence standard should have been applied.
The vast majority of courts that have addressed the issue have held that preponderance of the evidence is the appropriate standard of proof under Sections 6700 and 6701. See Mattingly v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Franklet v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Donnell R. Mattingly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Urrutia (Jose Santo)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Illya Bond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Music Masters, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GarrityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Frances Carlson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Bailey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- Martin A. Kapp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
- Allen R. Davison v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.