Love v. Dorman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Ernest Gary, J., Cherokee, November, 1911. Action by W. P. Love et al. against Nannie J. Dorman et al. Plaintiffs appeal. cite: Code of Proc. 87, 182; 23 Cyc. 1052; Code 1902, 993; 17 S. C. 75; 13 S. C. 200; 26 S. C. 119; 28 S. C. 121; 23 Cyc. 857, 1082; 10 Micb. 642; 51 Barb., Stephens v. Vontee. cites: Code of Proc. 87; 8 Cow. 190, 232; Chev. 5; 13 S. C. 201; 17 S. C. 75; 28 S. C. 119; 39 S. C. 483; 88 N. W. 292; 80 N. W. 131; 51 N. Y. Supp. 384; 60 N. W. 153; 6…
Read the full summary
Before Ernest Gary, J., Cherokee, November, 1911. Action by W. P. Love et al. against Nannie J. Dorman et al. Plaintiffs appeal. cite: Code of Proc. 87, 182; 23 Cyc. 1052; Code 1902, 993; 17 S. C. 75; 13 S. C. 200; 26 S. C. 119; 28 S. C. 121; 23 Cyc. 857, 1082; 10 Micb. 642; 51 Barb., Stephens v. Vontee. cites: Code of Proc. 87; 8 Cow. 190, 232; Chev. 5; 13 S. C. 201; 17 S. C. 75; 28 S. C. 119; 39 S. C. 483; 88 N. W. 292; 80 N. W. 131; 51 N. Y. Supp. 384; 60 N. W. 153; 6 Blackf. 246; 29 App. Div. (N. Y.) 83. As 1o collateral attack: 31 Am. Dec. 478; 17 S. C. 75.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice PrasER.
Statement of facts:
“This was originally an action by the plaintiffs against the defendants, who were the heirs at law -of Jas. G. Love, deceased, to partition the lands of the deceased. Under the decree of the Court, the lands were ordered to be sold for partition and division among the parties in interest. After the lands had been sold, and the proceeds partially paid out, claim was made by the attorney for L. D. Childs, t'he respondent herein, that he held two judgments which ■had been ‘transcripted’ to the Circuit Court from the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Benson v. CarrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. BrewerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Columbia "20" Truck Stop, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999