Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Hare

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1913No. S.F. No. 6465PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Application in this court for a writ commanding defendants, as members of the board of election commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, to register the plaintiff as a qualified voter of said city and county.

The plaintiff was born and ever since has resided in the state of California. On August 14, 1909, being then a resident and citizen of this state and of the United States, she was lawfully married to Gordon Mackenzie, a native and subject of the kingdom of Great Britain. He had resided in California prior to that time, still resides here and it is his intention to make this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Inglis v. Trustees of Sailor's Snug Harbour in City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Talbot v. JansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  5. Kreitz v. BehrensmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API