Legal Opinion

Ludlow Valve Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 19, 1908No. 4PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from The Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The following is the opinion of Buffington, Circuit Judge, in the court below: This case was before us on an application for a preliminary injunction, which, after argument, we refused. The proofs on final hearing disclose nothing substantially different or additional, and after argument and careful consideration, we see no reason to grant the decree and injunction now sought.

Read the full summary

Appeal from The Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The following is the opinion of Buffington, Circuit Judge, in the court below: This case was before us on an application for a preliminary injunction, which, after argument, we refused. The proofs on final hearing disclose nothing substantially different or additional, and after argument and careful consideration, we see no reason to grant the decree and injunction now sought. While the record is large, the questions involved are within narrow limits. Apart from some minor articles, the sale of which…

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant and complainant below filed its bill in the Circuit Court, seeking to restrain the appellee and defendant below from infringing complainant’s trade-mark, which consisted of the word “Ludlow,” as applied to valves, hydrants and other hydraulic appliances. The bill also alleged unfair competition, from which it also sought relief. The pertinent facts of the case are as follows:

The complainant is a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey in 1891, and is the successor of a New York corporation of similar name, organized in 1806 by one Henry G. Ludlow,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Saalfield Pub. Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  2. O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. R. H. MacY & Co. v. Colorado Clothing Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Bates Mfg. Co. v. Bates Numbering Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Everlasting Valve Co. v. SchillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API