Legal Opinion

Gutkes v. New York Produce Exchange

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Triad of issues of law raised by demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

Leaving out all adjectives and hard words, and summarizing much verbiage, the complaint alleges that the defendant corporation, The Eew York Produce Exchange, posted on its bulletin board in its building where merchants and traders congregate to do business, the following written notice concerning the plaintiff, a produce merchant, viz. :

“ Pursuant to the provisions of Section 36 of the by-laws, A. H. Gutkes of 90 Van Dyck Street, Brooklyn, is prohibited representation on the floor of the Exchange during the pleasure of the Board of Managers.
“Any member of the Exchange who shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smid v. BernardNew York Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Carroll v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Rodger v. American Kennel Club, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Valentine v. GonzalezNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Gutkes v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API