Legal Opinion

Randall v. Kemler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal dismissed. The judge on March 14, 1947, found for the plaintiff in an action of summary process. If the action of the judge is to be regarded as an order for judgment, Sasserno v. Sasserno, 240 Mass. 583; Watts v. Watts, 312 Mass. 442, an appeal filed on April 4, 1947, must be dismissed because it was not filed within twenty days after the entry of the order as required by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 96, Burnham v. Dollard, 269 Mass. 530. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53. We do not think the action of the judge was the entry of judgment, but, if it were, the present appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Everett-Morgan Co. v. Boyajian PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Watts v. WattsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. U-Dryvit Auto Rental Co. v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Selig v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oeschger v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API