Dincer v. Dincer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, BUT LIMITED to the following issues:(1) Whether the Superior Court erred by failing to properly credit Belgium as the “home state” as defined in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 23 Pa. C.S.A § 5341 et seq., and by requiring that the “quality” of contacts with the home state be examined.(2) Whether the Superior Court erred by expanding the “significant connections” test of the UCCJA to include the most minimal connections.(4) Whether the Superior Court erred by failing to base its legal…
3Cited by3 opinions
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Speer v. Brunswick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1997