Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Faraldo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1905No. 15,238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by C. E. P. Calhoun against H. B.. Faraldo. The town of Colfax intervened. Judgment for plaintiff was reversed, by the-Court of Appeal, and C. E. P. Calhoun applies for writ of certiorari or writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Plaintiff lost her suit before the Court of Appeal, and the judgment she had obtained before the district ■court was in consequence reversed.

She seeks in this application to have the judgment of the district court reinstated as legal, and to have the judgment of the Court •of Appeal decreed null and illegal.

Faraldo, the defendant, is in possession of the property as licensee of the town of Colfax, it seems. Plaintiff is opposed in her ■suit by the town of Colfax, intervenor.

The real issue is between plaintiff and Tntervenor. The defendant, Faraldo, takes no interest in the title, as he only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calhoun v. Town of ColfaxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Groce v. Phoenix InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Burks v. MoodyMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Stockstill v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API