Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Wiggins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1856PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Cass. Heard before the Hon. W. W. Morris. The note was dated at Jefferson, Texas, July 27th, 1854, due one day after date. The suit was commenced February 15th, 1855. The petition alleged that all the defendants resided in Cass county when suit was commenced. The other facts appear in the Opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

This suit was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note, executed by Elliott and one Hubert, payable to Thomas McAllenney or order, indorsed by McAllenney to Eason, who indorsed it to Cogue, who indorsed it to one Moseley, by whom it was indorsed to Wiggins, the defendant in error. The suit was brought under the statute against Elliott, one of the makers,—and it is alleged in the petition that the residence of the other joint and several maker “ is not hnoton,”—and against the indorsers above named, with the exception of Moseley, the last indorser, who was not sued. *597The suit was not…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Giddings v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Wood v. Canfield Paper Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McCamant v. McCamantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Beauchamp v. ChesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Smith v. T. M. Richardson Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API