Legal Opinion

People v. Heslington

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 2011No. G043371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

The People charged defendant Brian David Heslington with possession of controlled substances and a weapon found during a search of his home pursuant to a warrant. Prior to trial defendant moved to quash and traverse the search warrant and suppress the evidence. Because the affidavit that supported the search warrant was partially sealed, the court, in considering defendant’s suppression motions, tried to comply with People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948 [30 Cal.Rptr.2d 651, 873 P.2d 1246] (Hobbs). But the court misapplied the Hobbs procedure and granted defendant’s suppression…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. HobbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Meiner v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. Meiner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. People v. Keigwin CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Loiacono CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API