Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leonard Smith, Inc. v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1985Published

1Dissent

Kane, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm since I do not find the matter ripe for the granting of summary judgment.

I agree with Special Term that issues of fact exist as to Robert Spuck’s status, i.e., was he an "authorized or * * * an unauthorized agent”. The fact that defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith (Merrill Lynch) conceded in the prior appeal (107 AD2d 902, 903) that Spuck was not an authorized agent of Guardian Life Insurance Company (Guardian Life) has no bearing on this case since neither of the banks involved here was a party to the prior appeal, which involved only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City University of New York v. Finalco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Leonard Smith, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API