Legal Opinion
In re Consumers Power Co. Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 1985No. 83-CV-6448-AAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
STEVEN D. PEPE, United States Magistrate.
This matter involves a review of a protective order entered by this Court on stipulation of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs’ executive committee, defendant Consumers Power and defendant Morgan Stanley. The case involves a securities fraud class action over certain representations regarding the Midland nuclear power plant being built by Consumers Power. Booth Newspapers, Inc., has moved to intervene under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b) to challenge the legality of the protective order asserting:
Reporters from the Ann Arbor News…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- John Does v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Antonio Cipollone, Individually, and as the of the Estate of Rose D. Cipollone, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation, Defendants-Petitioners. Susan Haines, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and of the Estate of Peter F. Rossi, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a New Jersey Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and the Tobacco Institute, Defendants- Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a New Jersey Corporation, the Tobacco Institute, and Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Honorable H. Lee Sarokin, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.