Von Gerichten v. Schermerhorn
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
Respondent Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip denied each of petitioner’s 14 separate applications for special exception. Now we have 14 separate article 78 OPLR proceedings brought by petitioner to review every one of these denials. The hearings, the returns and these proceedings reflect almost identical issues of fact and law. We shall therefore follow the parties’ lead and treat these matters collectively and as one.
By the terms of article XVIII of the Islip Zoning Ordinance the Board of Appeals is empowered to grant such special exceptions where otherwise permissible, as it deems will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Gilbert v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Hiscox v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Hess v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Family Consultation Service of Eastchester, Inc. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohalan v. SchermerhornNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Fleischman v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011