Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1959No. 58-639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in a personal injury action .appeals from a summary final judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff was a workman in a construction crew remodeling a warehouse and the defendant, Astor Electric Service, Inc., was the electrical contractor upon the job. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment came on to be heard upon the complaint, answer and the deposition of the plaintiff. The plaintiff relied upon his deposition and defendant’s answers to interrogatories. After indulging in every reasonable presumption for the party against whom summary judgment was sought it conclusively…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kagan v. EisenstadtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. Andrews v. GoetzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Jacobs v. ClaughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hogan v. NorfleetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Pope v. KayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API