Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1913No. Nos. 20,080, 20,088PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action by William B. Bloomfield and another against W. B. Thompson, Commissioner of Public Utilities, and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs apply for writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.

The relators herein, William B. Bloomfield and the New Orleans Board of Trade, Limited, as holders of three of the $1,000 bonds of the Public Belt Railroad of the city of New Orleans, complain that the contract of said bonds will be impaired if a certain ordinance passed by the commission council of the city is carried into effect, and they ask for an injunction.

The defense is that the relators are without pecuniary interest, and therefore without standing, to litigate the matter, and that the said ordinance does not, as a matter of fact, have the said injurious effect. Incidentally it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Walker v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Cary Library v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Bloomfield v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davies v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Oberly v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Landry v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Castelluccio v. Cloverland Dairy Products Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Parker v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API