Migilore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This cause is before us on appeal from a departure sentence. The only statement of the reasons for departure is found in the guideline scoresheet and states:
He is an habitual offender in that he has no respect for the property of others and has committed heinous crimes while awaiting sentence on this crime. He shows no remorse.
None of the reasons listed on the score-sheet is sufficient for departure from the guidelines. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1987); Hill v. State, 498 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Aleman v. State, 498 So.2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Bradley v. State, 509 So.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Sarvis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.