Legal Opinion
Wells v. Fruth, Jamison & Elsass, PLLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2015No. CA 14-826PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAVOIE, Judge.
|! Plaintiff, Tamba Mclntire Wells, appeals the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Fruth, Jamison & Elsass, PLLC (“Fruth, Jamison”) and Katherine Loos, LLC. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
During Tamba Wells’s marriage to Dan Michael Wells, Mr. Wells incurred a debt with Fruth, Jamison & Elsass, PLLC, a Minnesota law firm, in the amount of $179,037.49 for attorney fees owed. Fruth, Jamison obtained a judgment in Minnesota against Mr. Wells for this amount.
Fruth, Jamison retained Katherine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Hardy v. BowieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Berard v. Home State County Mutual Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: The Medical Review Panel of Henrietta Houck v. Baton Rouge General Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Nickie Lejeune v. Kayla Fontenot, M.D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- Rick Sutton v. Jack Adams, Charles Adams and Polly Point Imports Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025