Legal Opinion

Bonker v. Ingersoll Products Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 21, 1955No. Civ. A. 53-1046-APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The plaintiff, while living with her mother in Pennsylvania, ate some of the defendant’s canned “Boneless Chicken Fricassee” and-was severely injured by swallowing a piece of bone. The chicken had been bought by the mother from a local grocer, who, in turn, had bought it several years before direct from the defendant, a Massachusetts manufacturer. The mother testified she had been persuaded to buy by the label, and the plaintiff testified she had seen the label while her mother was preparing the meal.

The plaintiff ate the chicken and was injured on April 2, 1952.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mannsz v. MacWhyte Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Linda Batiste v. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2015
  3. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Primak v. Star Market Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API