Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2017No. 2948/08 3781 2922/11 3780Published

1DissentKahn, J.

I believe that defendants Doran Allen and Bevon Burgan were properly convicted and sentenced for the reasons that follow. Therefore, I respectfully dissent in part.

For the reasons stated by the majority, I agree that both verdicts were supported by legally sufficient evidence, and were not against the weight of the evidence. .

Although the People re-presented, or commenced a re-presentation, of defendants’ cases to the grand jury without first obtaining leave from the court, and the circumstances of each of the original presentations made it necessary to obtain such leave (see CPL 190.75 [3];…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API