Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Chance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1923No. 2788Published

1DissentBotts, J.

The majority say that the exact question before us “is whether or not the trial court had' the power to inquire into the question of whether or not there was any competent evidence whatever submitted to the grand jury as a basis upon which it returned the indictment.” This is my first point of disagreement. As will be seen from the statement of the case made by the majority, the prosecution, by demurring to the plea in abatement, admits that there was no such competent evidence before the grand jury. The exact question, therefore, is whether or not the trial court had the power to quash, or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. CoolidgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1815
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Charge to Grand JuryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API