Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Underwriting Members of Lloyd's of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered May 20, 1996, which granted plaintiff’s motion to require defendants to post preanswer security of $1,554,138.84 in compliance with Insurance Law § 1213 (c) (1), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to defendants’ argument, the motion court did not conclude that the bonding requirement applied even if *279defendants had not transacted business in New York. Rather, the court found that defendants had engaged in purposeful activities in this State. We note that defendants’ contentions with respect to the purported lack of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callon Petroleum v. New York State Department of InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. MF Global Holdings Ltd. v. Allied World Assurance Co. (In re MF Global Holdings Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Global Art Exhibitions, Inc. v. Kuhn & Bulow Italia Insurance Broker GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API