Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Duncan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauee, P. J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment against him on demurrer to his petition. *475The petition contains two counts, the one charging the plaintiff as indorser, and the other charging him as guarantor of a promissory note. The following facts appear by the face of the petition. The defendant was payee of the note and in August 1877, assigned the same to one Grant by the following written indorsment: “Waiving notice, protest and demand, I assign the within note to Samuel Grant for value received, and I guarantee the payment of it.” Grant assigned the note to the plaintiff in June, 1891. The note…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bender v. MarkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Craig v. Callaway County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  3. County of Vernon ex rel. School Fund v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Bennett v. McCanseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Leach v. AsherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maddox v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Clinton County ex rel. Township 54, Range 30 v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Conkling v. Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API