Legal Opinion

Exchange Nat. Bank v. Okeya Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 14820PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydick, J.

This ease involves the invalidity of a lien- claimed under section 7464, Comp. Stats. 1921, and filed upon a leasehold for oil and gas, and is based upon services rendered in drilling wells thereon. The lease was owned by the Okeya Oil & Gas Company, a corporation. F. B. Mays is the lien claimant.

The Exchange National Bank of Tulsa brought this action in the district court of Tulsa county against the Okeya Oil & Gas Company and on January 8. 1921, recovered a judgment against that company for $34.-449.64 and a further judgment foreclosing a mortgage lien upon said leasehold and ordering the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Doolittle v. PlenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Beach v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Bowman Lumber Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blose v. Havre Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Geo. H. Greenan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Standard Accident Ins. v. United States Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. The City of RomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API