Legal Opinion

Parnicky v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 1985No. 80-274-E; CA A30814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a civil action in which plaintiffs sought to quiet title and to establish a boundary. The action was filed primarily because defendants Williams asserted that they held a perpetual easement over plaintiffs’ property.1 Plaintiffs appeal from a trial court judgment dismissing their claims and quieting title in defendants Williams. Third-party defendant Piccinati, owner of property abutting plaintiffs’ property, also appeals. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to enter a judgment in his favor after defendants Williams dismissed their third party claims for easement rights…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacobson v. Mountain Park Home Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maduff Mortgage Corp. v. Deloitte Haskins & SellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Parnicky v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API