Legal Opinion

Cassandra Lynn Hayes v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2015No. 13-CF-927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant Cassandra Hayes was found guilty of assault with significant bodily injury and aggravated assault. 1 Appellant’s principal theory at trial was that Mattie Eubank (“Eu-bank”) assaulted the victim, Eleanor Crump (“Crump”). Eubank was prepared to corroborate this theory by testifying at trial in exchange for immunity, but the government declined to immunize her after finding potential for perjury during a debriefing procedure pursuant to Carter v. United States, 684 A.2d 881 (D.C.1996) (en banc). Without immunity, Eubank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. Albert G. BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Nero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Rice, Nero, Miller White & Goodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. KEVIN YOUNG v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. David GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. Valdez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API