Legal Opinion

Webb v. Sowell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 19, 2010No. 26807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

This is a direct appeal from the family court’s order requiring appellant, Timothy L. Webb (Father), to contribute to college expenses for his son, respondent Timothy Loren Webb, Jr. (Son). Because we find that Risinger v. Risinger, 273 S.C. 36, 253 S.E.2d 652 (1979) was wrongly decided and that S.C.Code Ann. § 63-3-530(A)(17)1, as interpreted, is unconstitutional, we reverse.

FACTS

Father and respondent Janice Rush Sowell (Mother) divorced in 1994. Father and Mother had two children born of the marriage; Son is the older of the two children. Son turned 18 on April 13, 2005, and started college…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. American Petroleum Institute v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. German Evangelical Lutheran Church v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McLeod v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. McLeod v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Webb v. SowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API