Wayne Bank v. Bob Schmidt Chevrolet, Inc.
Lucas County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtRestivo, J.
This cause is presently before the court upon the motion of the plaintiff, The Wayne Bank, for summary judgment on its claim against defendant Bob Schmidt Chevrolet, and on the motion of the third-party defendant, Gerald E. Fuerst, to dismiss the third-party complaint. The cause was submitted on the pleadings, the attached affidavits and the briefs of counsel. In consideration of the same, this court finds that the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is not well-taken and must be denied, but that the third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss is well-taken and should be granted.
The facts of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houk v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Coca-Cola Bottling Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. SquiresDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
- Arrow Ford, Inc. v. Western Landscape Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. ParteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Field v. Key Bank (In Re Mireles)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- PACCAR Financial Corp. v. J.L. Healy Construction Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1983