United States v. Arriaga
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
STUCKY, Judge,
with whom RYAN, Judge, joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part and in the result):
I concur in the majority’s opinion holding that burglary under Article 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 929 (2006), always constitutes the offense of housebreaking under Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (2006), and therefore that housebreaking is necessarily included in— and is a lesser included offense of — the offense of burglary under the elements test of United States v. Jones, 68 M.J. 465 (C.A.A.F.2010). See United States v. Arriaga, 70 M.J. at 53-55…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.