Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Arriaga

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 29, 2011No. 10-0572/AFPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

STUCKY, Judge,

with whom RYAN, Judge, joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part and in the result):

I concur in the majority’s opinion holding that burglary under Article 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 929 (2006), always constitutes the offense of housebreaking under Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (2006), and therefore that housebreaking is necessarily included in— and is a lesser included offense of — the offense of burglary under the elements test of United States v. Jones, 68 M.J. 465 (C.A.A.F.2010). See United States v. Arriaga, 70 M.J. at 53-55…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API