Hofer v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER RE: REINSTATEMENT PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.29
I. ISSUE
An attorney seeking reinstatement under C.R.C.P. 251.29 must prove compliance with all disciplinary orders, fitness to practice, and rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence. The People stipulated that Petitioner complied with all applicable disciplinary orders. Petitioner provided substantial evidence as to his fitness to practice and the meaningful and sustained change in his character since the time of his original suspension. Should the Hearing Board reinstate Petitioner’s license to practice law?
DECISION OF…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Goff v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Lockley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004