Legal Opinion

Hofer v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 13, 2006No. 06PDJ044Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER RE: REINSTATEMENT PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.29

I. ISSUE

An attorney seeking reinstatement under C.R.C.P. 251.29 must prove compliance with all disciplinary orders, fitness to practice, and rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence. The People stipulated that Petitioner complied with all applicable disciplinary orders. Petitioner provided substantial evidence as to his fitness to practice and the meaningful and sustained change in his character since the time of his original suspension. Should the Hearing Board reinstate Petitioner’s license to practice law?

DECISION OF…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Goff v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Lockley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API