Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Badie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1940No. 17361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by the owner of a baby grand piano against a warehouseman for damages to the piano in the sum of $200 “due to the carelessness and negligence on the part of defendant in not properly storing same, and (petitioner) now avers that the doctrine of ‘res ipsa loquitur’ ap plies in this case”. The defendant denied all responsibility for the damage to plaintiff’s piano and avers that the piano was in a bad condition when stored with him and that it was returned to plaintiff in the same condition in which it was received.

There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. MussachiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Scott v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Marks v. New Orleans Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Schwartz, Kauffman & Co. v. BaerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  5. Harrison v. LoyocanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Orange Rice Milling Co. v. Hope Rice MillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Kotteman Furniture Co. v. McLellanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Carrol v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Camp v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API