People v. Morgan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cahill
We are asked to consider under what circumstances a capital defendant is entitled to a new sentencing hearing after receiving a limited pardon removing the death penalty as a legal consequence of his actions. The circuit court held defendant Samuel Morgan was not entitled to a hearing on remand and sentenced him to natural life in prison. We agree defendant was not entitled to a new hearing under the facts here and the reasoning set out in People v. Collins, 351 Ill. App. 3d 959, 815 N.E.2d 860 (2004). Natural life imprisonment was the only legal sentencing alternative, other than death, for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People Ex Rel. Madigan v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- William Bracy and Roger Collins v. James Schomig and Roger CowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morgan v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- People v. MorganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007