Legal Opinion
Bigham v. Yundt
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 19, 1924No. 4314PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. “This court will in ho case undertake to pass upon questions presented by a bill of exceptions, when it affirmatively appears that, even if the judgment of the court below were reversed, the plaintiff in error would derive no benefit from the adjudication.”
2. It appearing that since the refusal of the injunction prayed for in the court below, no supersedeas having been applied for or granted, the defendant has done all that was sought to be enjoined, the writ of error will be dismissed without prejudice. Davis v. Mayor &c. of Jasper, 119 Ga. 57 (45 S. E. 724); Henderson v. Hoppe, 103 Ga.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. Mayor of JasperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Henderson v. HoppeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Tabor v. HippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Clements v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Fletcher v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bridges v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Hagans v. Excelsior Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Waldron v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.