Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Kennett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1897Published

Qui tam Action.—Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

Section 130 of the Criminal Code of this State is as follows :

“ Whoever contracts to have or give to himself or another the option to sell or buy at a future time, any grain, or other commodity, stock of any railroad or other company, or gold, or forestalls the market by spreading false rumors to influence the price of commodities therein, or corners the market, or attempts to do so in relation to any of such commodities, shall be fined not less than $10 or more than $1,00.1, or confined in the county jail not exceeding one year, or both; and all contracts made in violation of this section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Edwards v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Schneider v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  4. Corcoran v. Lehigh & Franklin Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StanbroIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API